Search This Blog

Tuesday, April 20, 2021

New insights on the role of cytokines in COVID-19

 

  • Maja Buszko
  • Aleksandra Nita-Lazar
  • Jung-Hyun Park
  • Pamela L. Schwartzberg
  • Daniela Verthelyi
  • Howard A. Young & 
  • Amy S. Rosenberg 

  • PDF: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-021-00901-9.pdf

  • In the midst of resurging COVID-19 cases, the second NIH/FDA virtual COVID-19 and Cytokines symposium was held on 1 December 2020, focusing on longitudinal studies of COVID-19 immunity, including long-term consequences, potential associations with autoimmunity and the multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).

    A central and ongoing quest in COVID-19 research is to establish why and how SARS-CoV-2 elicits heterogeneity in disease severity and immunopathology among infected individuals. Hence, much effort has been exerted to understand the cellular basis of SARS-CoV-2-induced immune responses, with the aim of identifying new biomarkers and prognostic tools and developing new therapeutic options. Cytokines emerged early as critical parameters in COVID-19 disease progression, and understanding the qualitative, quantitative and temporal differences in cytokine expression is considered critical for the conquest of COVID-19.

    As the late-2020 fall surge brought the third phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, with record numbers of new cases and deaths, the NIH/FDA Immunology, COVID-19, and Cytokine Interest Groups hosted the second NIH/FDA virtual COVID-19 and Cytokines symposium, bringing together experts in these areas to present the most up-to-date data and to provide a forum for discussion, which focused on recent immunological characterization of the disease and its consequences, including MIS-C.

    Opening with a summary of the current challenges and achievements in fighting SARS-CoV-2, Anthony Fauci (NIAID/NIH) and Janet Woodcock (CDER/FDA) presented a road map for extending these efforts, as our understanding of the disease and tools for managing COVID-19 are evolving1. Fauci reflected on parallels with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic in the 1980s, which revealed gaps in our knowledge but also led to many outstanding basic and clinical discoveries. Similarly, COVID-19 is an enormous public health problem that challenges scientists and clinicians to rapidly advance our understanding of the immune system and its impact on human disease. Fauci further emphasized the importance of delineating the role of cytokines in COVID-19 pathogenesis and resolution and the effects of antiviral and immunomodulatory treatment strategies, as well as vaccines, on immune responses. In turn, Woodcock pointed out that therapeutic interventions serve as a learning tool and can provide new insights into the pathogenesis of the disease. However, the lack of markers defining different stages of the disease has impeded our understanding of the proper timing for treatment regimens, with some therapies resulting in negative effects when given too late or too early in the disease course. The work presented in this symposium outlined efforts to address these issues.

  • Concluding remarks

    It has become abundantly clear that cytokines play a commanding role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Cytokine expression is not only a prognostic biomarker for the disease outcome and severity of COVID-19, but SARS-CoV-2-induced cytokine expression is also understood to be a potent agitator of the host immune system, leading to destructive autoinflammation, organ failure and death. As such, the second NIH/FDA symposium on Cytokines in COVID-19 was timely, showcasing cutting-edge research conducted by the immunology community to understand the cytokine-driven pathology of COVID-19. Harnessing knowledge of the virus as well as of autoimmune processes, the speakers highlighted emerging areas of research that may yield new therapeutic targets to reduce the clinical impact of the disease and minimize sequelae.

    The virtual nature of the symposium permitted speakers and audiences from around the world to participate in real time, with over 800 viewers logging in on the day of the event and many more subsequently making use of the archived videos. Such worldwide interest illustrated the cutting-edge nature of the talks but also accentuated the need for rapid dissemination of COVID-19-related data to the scientific community. Nonetheless, it was also clear that many questions remain, including the expression patterns and timing of cytokines that are relevant to the disease course and how differences in genetics and environment may contribute. Furthermore, the many nuances to measuring cytokines, including methods for and timing of the collection, treatment, storage and assay of samples, may need to be addressed before specific cytokines can be used reproducibly as disease biomarkers to monitor and predict disease progression and recovery. SARS-CoV-2 presents a set of unique challenges that require navigation through uncharted territories and collaboration on the part of the scientific community. We expect that increasing efforts to interrogate the role of cytokines in COVID-19 will provides us with new tools to map and understand the molecular landscape of this viral disease.

  • https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-021-00901-9


  • Antibody evasion by the P.1 strain of SARS-CoV-2

     Wanwisa Dejnirattisai 1Daming Zhou 2Piyada Supasa 3Chang Liu 4Alexander J Mentzer 5Helen M Ginn 6Yuguang Zhao 2Helen M E Duyvesteyn 2Aekkachai Tuekprakhon 3Rungtiwa Nutalai 3Beibei Wang 3César López-Camacho 3Jose Slon-Campos 3Thomas S Walter 2Donal Skelly 7Sue Ann Costa Clemens 8Felipe Gomes Naveca 9Valdinete Nascimento 9Fernanda Nascimento 9Cristiano Fernandes da Costa 10Paola Cristina Resende 11Alex Pauvolid-Correa 12Marilda M Siqueira 11Christina Dold 13Robert Levin 14Tao Dong 15Andrew J Pollard 13Julian C Knight 16Derrick Crook 17Teresa Lambe 18Elizabeth Clutterbuck 13Sagida Bibi 13Amy Flaxman 18Mustapha Bittaye 18Sandra Belij-Rammerstorfer 18Sarah C Gilbert 18Miles W Carroll 19Paul Klenerman 20Eleanor Barnes 20Susanna J Dunachie 21Neil G Paterson 6Mark A Williams 6David R Hall 6Ruben J G Hulswit 2Thomas A Bowden 2Elizabeth E Fry 2Juthathip Mongkolsapaya 22Jingshan Ren 23David I Stuart 24Gavin R Screaton 25

  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.055              
  • Abstract

    Terminating the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic relies upon pan-global vaccination. Current vaccines elicit neutralizing antibody responses to the virus spike derived from early isolates. However, new strains have emerged with multiple mutations, including P.1 from Brazil, B.1.351 from South Africa, and B.1.1.7 from the UK (12, 10, and 9 changes in the spike, respectively). All have mutations in the ACE2 binding site, with P.1 and B.1.351 having a virtually identical triplet (E484K, K417N/T, and N501Y), which we show confer similar increased affinity for ACE2. We show that, surprisingly, P.1 is significantly less resistant to naturally acquired or vaccine-induced antibody responses than B.1.351, suggesting that changes outside the receptor-binding domain (RBD) impact neutralization. Monoclonal antibody (mAb) 222 neutralizes all three variants despite interacting with two of the ACE2-binding site mutations. We explain this through structural analysis and use the 222 light chain to largely restore neutralization potency to a major class of public antibodies.

    Conflict of interest statement

    Declaration of interests G.R.S. sits on the GSK Vaccines Scientific Advisory Board. Oxford University holds intellectual property related to the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. A.J.P. is chair of the UK Department Health and Social Care’s (DHSC) Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation (JCVI) but does not participate in the JCVI COVID-19 committee and is a member of the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) SAGE. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of DHSC, JCVI, or WHO. S.C.G. is co-founder of Vaccitech (collaborators in the early development of this vaccine candidate) and is named as an inventor on a patent covering use of ChAdOx1-vectored vaccines and a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (PCT/GB2012/000467). T.L. is named as an inventor on a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and was a consultant to Vaccitech for an unrelated project during the conduct of the study. The University of Oxford has entered into a partnership with AstraZeneca on coronavirus vaccine development.The University of Oxford has protected intellectual property disclosed in this publication.


    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33852911/

    Pathologic Antibodies to Platelet Factor 4 after AStraZeneca Covid Vaccine

     

  • Marie Scully, M.D., 
  • Deepak Singh, B.Sc., 
  • Robert Lown, M.D., 
  • Anthony Poles, M.D., 
  • Thomas Solomon, M.D., 
  • Marcel Levi, M.D., 
  • David Goldblatt, M.D., Ph.D., 
  • Pavel Kotoucek, M.D., 
  • William Thomas, M.D., 
  • and William Lester, M.D.

  • DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2105385

  • Full article: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2101765?query=recirc_top_ribbon_article_1

  • Abstract

    BACKGROUND

    The mainstay of control of the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic is vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Within a year, several vaccines have been developed and millions of doses delivered. Reporting of adverse events is a critical postmarketing activity.

    METHODS

    We report findings in 23 patients who presented with thrombosis and thrombocytopenia 6 to 24 days after receiving the first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AstraZeneca). On the basis of their clinical and laboratory features, we identify a novel underlying mechanism and address the therapeutic implications.

    RESULTS

    In the absence of previous prothrombotic medical conditions, 22 patients presented with acute thrombocytopenia and thrombosis, primarily cerebral venous thrombosis, and 1 patient presented with isolated thrombocytopenia and a hemorrhagic phenotype. All the patients had low or normal fibrinogen levels and elevated d-dimer levels at presentation. No evidence of thrombophilia or causative precipitants was identified. Testing for antibodies to platelet factor 4 (PF4) was positive in 22 patients (with 1 equivocal result) and negative in 1 patient. On the basis of the pathophysiological features observed in these patients, we recommend that treatment with platelet transfusions be avoided because of the risk of progression in thrombotic symptoms and that the administration of a nonheparin anticoagulant agent and intravenous immune globulin be considered for the first occurrence of these symptoms.

    CONCLUSIONS

    Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 remains critical for control of the Covid-19 pandemic. A pathogenic PF4-dependent syndrome, unrelated to the use of heparin therapy, can occur after the administration of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. Rapid identification of this rare syndrome is important because of the therapeutic implications.


  • https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2105385