Search This Blog

Monday, July 10, 2023

New German Guidelines Change the Paradigm for Asthma

 Asthma has long been associated with the use of inhalers to control symptoms. The new S2K guideline on the management of asthma, compiled by experts and published in March 2023, aims to change this. "For decades, we have known about medication that can be used to put asthma into remission. The patient can go out or travel on vacation without an inhaler. This is possible. This is a symptom-prevention approach," said the guideline coordinator Marek Lommatzsch, MD, PhD, head senior physician of the Pulmonology Department at the University Medicine Rostock, Germany, in a conversation with Medscape Medical News.

The guideline was created by the German Respiratory Society, and a further 11 professional societies from Germany and Austria were involved in the update. The authors comprehensively revised the guideline from 2017, and the evidence-based national disease management guideline (NVL) for general asthma care from 2020 was amended.

Erika von Mutius, MD, PhD, pediatrician and professor of pediatric allergology and pulmonology at the Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital and director of the Institute of Asthma and Allergy Prevention at Helmholtz Munich, was not directly involved in the guideline. In a conversation with Medscape, she said, "This guideline is an informed statement that takes the development over recent years into account. It had been anticipated for some time now. For me, the input from pediatricians should be particularly noted."

Anti-Inflammatory Therapy

The significance of anti-inflammatory therapy was stressed in the NVL from 2020. The new guideline holds that anti-inflammatory therapy should be considered the primary therapeutic option. "We are making a U-turn: only treat the respiratory inflammation. Salbutamol should still only be given in exceptional cases as required," according to Lommatzsch.

In the guideline, asthma therapy is described using an updated step-by-step plan. Inhaled glucocorticoids (ICS) represent the most important pillar of therapy. ICS can be used as permanent therapy or as as-needed therapy in fixed combination with formoterol, which rapidly dilates the airways.

Allergen immunotherapy, also known as hyposensitization, and biologics are also effective anti-inflammatory treatments, Lommatzsch added. "We must ensure that these anti-inflammatory medicines are also used effectively. Mild to moderate forms of asthma can be treated easily by a primary care physician," he said. Basic diagnostics in the form of a blood sample are required. A somewhat more comprehensive medical history is also needed. "It takes a little more time and involves more than just taking the inhaler out of the cupboard."

The situation regarding children, however, is a little different with regard to anti-inflammatory therapy, von Mutius explained. "Childhood asthma has many forms, and confirming the diagnosis is not always straightforward, especially in infancy. If needed, salbutamol can be prescribed. However, the anti-inflammatory medication should usually also be administered."

She emphasized that the guideline has been designed in a sophisticated way that offers the option of "using medical experience to see what is suitable for this family or better for this patient. This is still always subject to medical judgment and responsibility. I find this really successful."

Diagnostics Using Biomarkers

The previous guideline concentrated on measuring lung function as a way of diagnosing asthmatic illness. Three biomarkers were brought to the fore:

  • Eosinophils in the blood

  • IgE levels

  • The FeNO test (proportion of nitrogen monoxide in exhaled air)

Slightly amended, the guideline now states that the FeNO test is implemented as "an integral component of specialist diagnosis."

The test measures the nitrogen monoxide content of exhaled air as an indicator of inflammation in the airways. However, this test must often be paid for by the patient. "In this respect, we want to give a nudge in the direction of the political decision-makers," emphasized Lommatzsch.

Von Mutius added that use of the FeNO test has not been established in many practices and outpatient clinics. The inflammatory marker is also subject to fluctuations. "This is an update to the guideline where we must wait to see the political response."

Which Biologic?

Despite treatment with the established therapies, the symptoms of asthma can persist in some people with severe forms of the condition. Biologics are highly effective for these patients and are preferable in the last stage of therapy to long-term therapy with oral steroids, which have numerous side effects. The current guideline provides an overview diagram to help decide which biologic is suitable for which patient.

"There are six biologics that can be used to treat severe asthma. Officially, almost any biologic can be taken into consideration for a patient, since the approvals overlap. Nevertheless, we known that certain patients benefit hugely from certain biologics. A targeted choice should therefore be made," explained Lommatzsch.

Biologics were mentioned in the 2020 NVL, but not to the great extent that they are in the latest version. "For first time, we have created an overview diagram for the individual choice of biologic. With it, we have now set a standard," said Lommatzsch.

Therapy with biologics has brought about rapid progress for adults. Von Mutius anticipates challenges in approving such therapeutics for pediatric treatment. "As is often the case, these therapies are not approved for young children. Meanwhile, dupilumab is approved for children aged 6 months and older; unfortunately, the indication for this is actually atopic dermatitis," she explains.

When using this therapy for pediatric patients, it is therefore important to explain the options to parents and to inform them of side effects. Severe forms of asthma are rare in children; they are uncommon in adults but are more prevalent than in children.

Children and Adolescents

One new chapter in the guideline describes giving medical advice to adolescents choosing a career. A table has been compiled that contains information regarding jobs and their respective allergy and asthma risk. The table is designed to be displayed in a medical practice.

Another chapter characterizes the interrelation between asthma and mental health. It differentiates between psychiatric comorbidities for which the patient requires professional help and the stress caused by the asthmatic illness itself. Many patients do not have a mental illness but do suffer under the everyday strain of having asthma, said Lommatzsch. Therefore, it is important to educate patients and their relatives on how to make a strength out of this supposed weakness — the asthmatic illness. "We have established a procedure for this and have summarized its key points in the guideline," said Lommatzsch.

Other updates to the guideline cover asthma in different contexts, such as in pregnant women. The updates address adrenal insufficiency as a side effect of the use of steroids over many years. In addition, the guideline contains a chapter on digital apps that can help with diagnostics and medical history.

Lommatzsch highlighted a new tool. "By using 15 key points summarized in a table, the guideline displays the essential differences between COPD [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease] and asthma in terms of the symptoms and the findings. It is the most modern table available in Germany that differentiates between the two diseases."

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/994179

Mental Health Questions Cut From MD Licensing Applications in 21 States

 Since May, physicians in 21 states are no longer being asked broad mental health or substance abuse questions when they apply for a medical license. That's a major shift that could ease doctors' concerns about seeking treatment, according to the Dr. Lorna Breen Heroes' Foundation, a physician burnout prevention group that tracks such changes.

The foundation was named in honor of Lorna Breen, MD, an emergency medicine physician in New York City who died by suicide in April 2020 as the pandemic unfolded. The rate of suicide among physicians is twice that of the general population.

"The issue is not whether a physician may have had a serious or a mild mental illness...but whether they have any disabilities that may affect their current work," said Peter Yellowlees, MD, distinguished professor of psychiatry at the University of California, Davis. "Asking about any past mental illness episodes, which may have occurred years previously...is simply discriminatory and is an example of the stigma associated with mental disorders."

The Breen Foundation has been working with state medical boards and hospitals to remove stigmatizing mental health and substance abuse questions from licensing and credentialing applications.

Breen had told her sister and brother-in-law shortly before her suicide that she was afraid she could lose her license and the career she loved if the medical board found out that she had received inpatient mental health treatment, said J. Corey Feist, JD, MBA, her brother-in-law and co-founder and president of the foundation.

She wasn't aware that New York was a state that didn't ask physicians questions about their mental health, said Feist.

"That's why we want to make it very clear to physicians which states continue to ask these questions and which ones don't," Feist said.

Many physicians share Breen's concern about professional consequences.

Four in 10 physicians said that they did not seek help for burnout or depression because they worried that their employer or state medical board would find out, according to the Medscape 'I Cry but No One Cares': Physician Burnout & Depression Report 2023.

One Oregon emergency department physician said that informing her state medical board about an episode of mania resulted in public disclosures, a 4-month long investigation, lost income, and poorer work evaluations. Looking back on her decision to be transparent with the board, Susan Haney, MD, said that she was naive. "The board is not your friend."

Fearing for her career, now-retired ob-gyn Robyn Alley-Hay, MD, never disclosed on licensing applications that in the 1990s, she had been hospitalized and treated for depression. She stopped practicing medicine in 2014 and now works as a life coach.

"I hated those questions because I felt I could never tell the whole truth," Alley-Hay said. "But I could always truthfully answer 'no' to questions about impairment. That was a line that I wouldn't cross ― if you're impaired, you shouldn't be practicing."

Does the Focus on Current Impairment Protect the Public?

New York, Texas, California, Montana, Illinois, and North Carolina are among the 21 states that either ask no health-related questions or ask only a single question to address physical and mental health, said Feist.

Most of these changes align with the 2018 Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) recommendations, said Joe Knickrehm, FSMB vice president of communications. "Application questions must focus only on current impairment and not on illness, diagnosis, or previous treatment in order to be compliant with the Americans With Disabilities Act," states the FSMB.

Mental health questions were often added to licensing and credentialing applications out of a "misplaced desire to protect patients and families from clinicians who might not be fit to give care. Yet there is no evidence they serve that function," said Feist.

Marian Hollingsworth, a patient safety advocate in California, says medical boards have a responsibility to ensure that doctors pose no risk or a negligible risk to the public. She questioned whether the medical boards can adequately protect the public if they only ask about medical conditions rather than mental illness or substance abuse.

"There's a fine line between privacy and right to know for public protection. I would want to see the approving medical board have assurance from a treating professional that this physician is stable and is doing well with continued treatment," said Hollingsworth.

Legislation Requires That Mental Health Questions Be Removed

In March, Virginia became the first state to enact a law that requires all healthcare profession regulatory boards, including medical boards, to remove or replace mental health questions on licensing, certification, and registration applications.

The law requires that boards use the following wording if they replace mental health questions: "Do you have any reason to believe you would pose a risk to the safety or well-being of patients?" "Are you able to perform the essential functions of your job with or without reasonable accommodations?"

The Illinois General Assembly passed a more limited bill in May that requires medical boards to remove or replace mental health questions on its licensing applications. Gov. J. B. Pritzker (D) is expected to sign the bill.

The Virginia Healthcare and Hospital Association, which represents more than 100 hospitals and health systems in the state, partnered with the Medical Society of Virginia and the Virginia Nurses Association to advocate for the new legislation.

"The reason that the Virginia coalition pushed for the law was because the state's medical boards weren't acting quickly enough. Although state laws vary about what medical boards can do, legislation isn't necessary in most states to change licensing questions," said Feist.

Virginia hospitals began working last year with the foundation to change their mental health questions on credentialing applications. About 20% of Virginia's hospitals have completed the process, including four large health systems: Inova, UVA Health, Centerra, and Children's Hospitals of King's Daughters, said Feist.

The foundation also challenged Lisa MacLean, MD, a psychiatrist and chief clinical wellness officer at the Henry Ford Medical Group in Detroit, to review their credentialing application for any stigmatizing mental health questions.

MacLean told the American Medical Association (AMA) that she had found one question that needed to be changed but that it took time to get through the hospital's approval process. Ultimately, the wording was changed from "a diagnosis or treatment of a physical, mental, chemical dependency or emotional condition" to "a diagnosis or treatment of any condition which could impair your ability to practice medicine."

National Medical Organizations Back Changes

The Joint Commission, which accredits hospitals, has emphasized since 2020 that it doesn't require hospitals to ask about an applicant's mental health history.

"We strongly encourage organizations to not ask about past history of mental health conditions or treatment," the Commission said in a statement. "It is critical that we ensure health care workers can feel free to access mental health resources."

The Joint Commission said it supports the FSMB recommendations and the AMA's recommendation that questions about clinicians' mental health be limited to "conditions that currently impair the clinicians' ability to perform their job."

More than 40 professional medical organizations, including the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Psychiatric Association, signed a joint statement in 2020 calling for changes in disclosure rules about mental health.

"The backing of major organizations is helpful because it's changing the conversation that occurs within and outside the house of medicine," said Feist.

Should Doctors Answer Mental Health Questions?

Many states continue to ask questions about hospitalization and mental health diagnoses or treatment on their licensing and credentialing applications.

Yellowlees advises doctors to "be honest and not lie or deny past mental health problems, as medical boards tend to take a very serious view of physicians who do not tell the truth."

However, the questions asked by medical boards can vary by state. "If it's possible, physicians can give accurate but minimal information while trying to focus mainly on their current work capacity," said Yellowlees.

He also suggested that physicians who are uncertain about how to respond to mental health questions consider obtaining advice from lawyers accustomed to working with the relevant medical boards.

Physicians who want to get involved in removing licensing and credentialing barriers to mental health care can find resources here and here.

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/994163

Viridian: Positive Data from Ongoing Phase 1/2 Trial in Chronic Thyroid Eye Disease

 VRDN-001 data demonstrated clinically meaningful and rapid improvement in signs and symptoms of chronic TED at week 6 after receiving two infusions of VRDN-001 10 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg –

- Ongoing THRIVE Phase 3 trial in patients with active TED amended to reflect Viridian’s confidence in 5-dose regimen and key stakeholder feedback on evolving TED treatment paradigm -

- THRIVE-2 Phase 3 trial in patients with chronic TED expected to start in third quarter 2023 –

- 3 mg/kg data support low-volume subcutaneous (SC) dosing profile for Company’s SC candidates in TED -

- Viridian plans to select lead SC program candidate by year-end 2023; VRDN-001 SC IND amendment and VRDN-003 IND submitted to the FDA –

- Conference call and webcast to be held today, Monday, July 10th at 5:00 p.m. ET -

The Company will host a conference call today at 5:00 p.m. ET to discuss the topline data and program updates in TED. The dial-in number for the conference call is 1-888-330-3622 for domestic participants and 1-646-960-0662 for international participants. The conference ID is 3961606.

A live webcast of the conference call can be accessed through the "Events" page in the Investors section of the Viridian Therapeutics website. Following the live webcast, an archived version of the call will also be available on the website.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/viridian-announces-positive-data-ongoing-200100530.html

Enzo: Purchase Price For Business Sold to Labcorp Cut

From $146M To $113.25M 

https://www.benzinga.com/m-a/23/07/33175150/enzo-biochem-said-on-july-3-unit-entered-amendment-to-purchase-agreement-dated-march-16-2023-amendme

Safety administration wants answers from Tesla on autopilot probe

 U.S. regulators from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) have asked Tesla for updated responses in an ongoing probe into the EV maker’s Autopilot system. The NHTSA sent a letter on July 3, demanding answers by July 19, on questions involving the design, engineering, analysis, modification, production, testing, assessment and evaluation of Tesla’s advanced driver assistance system.

TickerSecurityLastChangeChange %
TSLATESLA INC.269.61-4.82-1.76%

The letter contained requests asking Tesla to list how many subject vehicles were manufactured for sale, lease or operation in the U.S. by model and year, furnish cumulative and separate mileage totals by vehicle model, and by model 

year versus calendar year and quarter, and to update its September 2022 response to the NHTSA’s August 2022 information request on how Autopilot works.  

The investigation covers 830,000 Tesla vehicles and follows a dozen crashes in which Tesla vehicles hit stopped emergency vehicles.

Tesla Factory

A view of Tesla's U.S. vehicle factory in Fremont, California. (Reuters / Shannon Stapleton / File / Reuters Photos)

The U.S. safety regulator is also assessing if Tesla vehicles effectively engage drivers using Autopilot.

In early June, the EV manufacturer was forced to recall 137 Tesla Model Ys over issues with the steering wheel fastener.

Teslaa Model Y interior

U.S. regulators from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have asked Tesla for updated responses in an ongoing probe into the EV maker’s Autopilot system. (Sjoerd van der Wal / Getty Images / File)


placeholder

In May, a class-action lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco after Tesla owners said software updates killed their EV battery life, cutting driving range by up to 20% while forcing some owners to replace their batteries at a cost of $15,000.


TickerSecurityLastChangeChange %
GMGENERAL MOTORS CO.39.64+0.03+0.08%
FFORD MOTOR CO.15.07+0.09+0.60%

Despite the string of product recalls, GM and Ford recently announced they would use Tesla's North American Charging Standard, and the company’s valuation jumped $240 billion amid 13 consecutive winning days on Wall Street in June.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/safety-administration-answers-tesla-autopilot-probe

FDA Puts Clinical Hold on Hemogenyx’s CAR-T AML Therapy

 The FDA has placed a clinical hold on Hemogenyx Pharmaceuticals’ investigational HEMO-CAR-T, which is being trialed for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the UK-based biotech announced Monday.

In its full review letter, the FDA pointed to manufacturing problems as the reason for the regulatory pause. In particular, the regulator flagged a “splicing deficiency” that arises during the production of the lentivirus that is used to create the CAR-T cells for Hemogenyx’s candidate, according to the company’s press release.

Hemogenyx has already found the source of the splicing issue and has come up with a method to solve it. CEO Vladislav Sandler said in a statement that the company is “confident” that it will “be able to address the FDA’s questions and concerns” regarding HEMO-CAR-T’s Investigational New Drug (IND) application.

The company submitted its IND seeking to launch a Phase I trial for HEMO-CAR-T in May 2023.

In its letter to Hemogenyx, the FDA also outlined suggestions that the biotech can take to further boost the safety profile of HEMO-CAR-T. However, these recommendations do not contribute to the current clinical hold “and can be dealt with readily,” according to the company.

Like other CAR-T-based therapies, HEMO-CAR-T works by first isolating a patient’s T cells and modifying them using a gene construct to allow them to recognize certain proteins expressed on cancer cells. Once these modified T cells have multiplied, they are put back into the patient, where they can seek out and destroy cancer cells.

HEMO-CAR-T sets itself apart from other molecules in the same class by using Hemogenyx’s proprietary humanized monoclonal antibody, which has been designed to target a unique antigen on AML cells, according to the company’s website.

With Monday’s clinical hold, Hemogenyx joins a growing list of biotech companies that have encountered regulatory roadblocks in AML.

In January 2023, Magenta Therapeutics was forced to put a Phase I/II dose-escalation study on hold after a patient died following treatment with its candidate MGTA-117. At a dose of 0.08 mg/kg, the patient in question experienced a grade 5 serious adverse event—respiratory failure and cardiac arrest resulting in death—which was deemed related to the study treatment.

Foghorn Therapeutics encountered a similar problem in August 2022, when a mortality pushed the FDA to put its investigational BRG1/BRM inhibitor, FHD-286, on full clinical hold. The patient’s potential cause of death was differentiation syndrome, which is a serious adverse event often associated with AML treatments. Foghorn's hold was lifted last month.

Other companies that have received regulatory pauses in AML include Curis and Kura Oncology. The Kura hold was lifted in January 2022 while the Curis hold was removed last week.

https://www.biospace.com/article/fda-puts-clinical-hold-on-hemogenyx-s-car-t-aml-therapy/