Search This Blog

Saturday, August 1, 2026

22 EU Leaders Demand "Immediate Action" As Migrant Invasion Ups Fear Of Hybrid Warfare

 Summary:

  • 22 EU Leaders Demand "Immediate Action"
  • Italy Suspends Schengen Travel Agreement With Spain After Horrifying Ceuta Invasion
  • Spain's Border Invasion Is An Optics Disaster For Open-Border Democrats
  • Crazy Footage Shows Migrants Rampaging, Breaking Into Homes After Invading Spain

22 EU Leaders Demand "Immediate Action" To Spanish Enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla Invasion 

European leaders criticized Madrid's socialist government as its open-border policies unraveled for the world to see.

The invasion of the Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla by 50,000 military-aged men from Morocco exposed the dire consequences of nation-killing mass-migration policies promoted by socialist regimes, which have long eroded national sovereignty across the entire continent. 

For Europe, the latest border breach represents one of the clearest warnings yet that uncontrolled mass migration has evolved from a political dispute into a full-blown national security crisis.

Hours after the invasion, Italy's Interior Ministry suspended Schengen free-movement rules with Spain and ordered the closure of air and maritime borders between the two countries, citing national security concerns.

The list of European leaders criticizing Spanish Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez is growing on Saturday, as 22 EU leaders have now signed on to a demand for an "immediate and coordinated European response" to the invasion into Ceuta and Melilla.

"We cannot allow uncontrolled mass crossings, the instrumentalization of migration or other hybrid threats to create the perception that illegal entry into the European Union is possible," EU leaders, including Denmark's Mette Frederiksen, Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Germany's Friedrich Merz, wrote in a letter published on X by Denmark's Ministry of State.

Sánchez and Spain's socialists are already feeling the impact of a negative information campaign that has spread across the West. The Trump administration is using the crisis as a warning to American voters ahead of the midterms that socialists gaining power would risk reopening the US border crisis. Political pressure on Sánchez will intensify further if illegal crossings resume or illegals reach mainland Europe.

The most likely pathway is, therefore, containment followed by political blowback against socialist parties in Madrid and across the bloc, rather than an immediate collapse of Schengen. Any second mass surge, however, would only suggest the weaponization of migration against Europe; in other words, asymmetric warfare. 

The open-ended question is who, if anyone, on the Moroccan side financed, organized, and facilitated the invasion.

Crazy Footage Shows Migrants Rampaging, Breaking Into Homes After Invading Spain

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity News,

Nearly 50,000 military-aged men stormed the Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla from Morocco in a single day. What followed was not "asylum-seeking." It was open looting, home invasions, vehicle burnings, and street chaos while Spanish authorities largely stood aside.

Spain's socialist government under Pedro Sánchez had already rolled out mass regularisation schemes and refused to treat the border as a national emergency.

The result played out in real time across the North African territories that form the European Union's only land borders with Africa.

Estimates from Spain's Interior Ministry and local sources put the number who crossed into Ceuta alone at around 49,000 in 24 hours - roughly equivalent to the U.S. troop presence in the Middle East.

Ceuta's president Juan Jesús Vivas described the situation as "absolutely unsustainable" and a "total humanitarian and social emergency," noting reception centres were already saturated and more than 200 arrivals a day had become routine in the preceding period.

Reports have also suggested that the influx was so severe that at least 19 to 34 migrants died in the waters or in stampedes at the Tarajal breakwater.

Footage from the ground shows columns of young men pouring through streets, scaling fences, and swimming around coastal barriers.

In Melilla the scenes turned violent just as quickly. Migrants set vehicles ablaze after breaching the border fence.

There is obviously no processing of these arrivals anywhere for them to go. Further videos captured groups breaking into residential buildings, looting stores, and occupying private property.

Some clips show African migrants forcing entry into Spanish homes in Ceuta while residents look on helplessly.

News footage highlighted crowds ofmilitary-agedd migrant men surrounding a Spanish woman who was visibly distressed as the men laughed and closed in around her - an image that has circulated widely as a symbol of the total collapse of order.

Local residents did not simply accept the invasion. In Ceuta, Spanish patriots took to the streets themselves to protect their neighborhoods and homes when official forces proved insufficient.

Groups of men formed ad-hoc patrols, confronting the influx directly.

The Spanish response was a deployment of roughly 100 to 150 military personnel and additional police.

Orders, according to on-the-ground reports, were to hold position rather than aggressively close the border or remove the entrants. Armored vehicles appeared, yet the fence remained open in places, and the flow continued through the night.

One reporter on the scene at 4:30 a.m. described 100 people crossing every minute while the military presence did little to stem it.

The scale and coordination point beyond spontaneous movement. Moroccan authorities were filmed emptying trucks full of young men near the Ceuta border.

Separate videos show convoys of trucks and buses ferrying thousands toward the frontier from towns an hour away.

Facebook groups with tens of thousands of members openly shared routes, maps, equipment lists, and contact numbers, framing the crossing as a "liberation."

One widely shared clip asks the obvious questions: who feeds them, who sets the date and route, and who benefits?

Observers have noted the timing - coming after a Spanish Supreme Court ruling that limited immediate pushbacks for sea arrivals and against the backdrop of long-running territorial disputes over the enclaves.

Some speculate Morocco is testing Spain's resolve or seeking leverage. One analysis framed the surge as a potential path to forcing Spanish evacuation of the territories it has held for centuries.

By Friday morning, a curious reverse movement also appeared. Hundreds of the same men began heading back toward Morocco on their own, citing hunger and the fact that the city was largely shut down.

"We are hungry, we are going home," some said on camera.

The political fallout has already crossed the Mediterranean. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni called the images from Ceuta proof that uncontrolled illegal immigration poses a concrete threat to Europe's borders and said Italy was prepared to take extraordinary measures, including suspension of Schengen with Spain.

Matteo Salvini demanded the same.

In France, Marine Le Pen insisted on immediate reinforcement of border controls and, if she wins power, restriction of free movement to EU nationals only.

Marion Maréchal described the events as a genuine migrant invasion that requires ending the current Schengen framework.

Finland, Sweden and Denmark also announced Support for the move.

Some think it's too little too late, however.

Sánchez's government has spoken of "solutions" and "cooperation" while deploying limited forces and rejecting a formal national emergency declaration.

The footage from Ceuta and Melilla shows what that approach produces: overwhelmed police, residents forced to defend their own streets, homes occupied, and a clear message to the next wave that the door remains open.

Europe's external border has been tested in the most public way possible. The question now is whether any government still willing to enforce it remains.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/crazy-footage-shows-migrants-rampaging-breaking-homes-after-invading-spain

AI virtual-care consolidation wave

 Two acquisitions announced a day apart this week point to a broader consolidation wave among AI-native virtual care companies, as scaled platforms move to acquire clinical data, provider networks and health plan capabilities rather than build them from scratch.

Included Health signed a definitive agreement July 28 to acquire Firefly Health, a clinically integrated health plan and advanced primary care company based in Watertown, Mass. The next day, AI-native primary care company Doctronic announced it had acquired Summer Health, a text-based virtual pediatric care platform. Neither company disclosed financial terms.

Firefly serves more than 20,000 people nationally and reported a 15% reduction in total cost of care in 2025 across its administrative-services-only book of business, with member satisfaction above 90%, according to the companies. The deal pairs Included Health’s AI-native, clinician-in-the-loop platform with Firefly’s National Committee for Quality Assurance-accredited primary care model and network of more than 2,300 in-person, in-home and specialty partners, with the goal of building a scaled health plan alternative for employers.

Doctronic’s acquisition of Summer Health, announced July 29, gives the company access to Summer Health’s library of more than 100,000 pediatric text-based patient interactions, which it plans to use to build out AI models trained specifically on pediatric care. The combined platform is intended to serve patients from birth through adulthood. Summer Health founder and CEO Ellen DaSilva is joining Doctronic as senior vice president of partnerships, leading expansion of its enterprise and health plan business.

Doctronic, which has supported more than 30 million health encounters over two years through its AI chatbot and a nationwide network of physicians offering $39 telehealth visits, raised a $40 million series B round in March.

The two deals follow a string of sizable combinations in digital health this year. Spring Health completed its acquisition of Alma in May, creating a combined mental health platform that the companies said now serves more than 170 million people worldwide across employers and health plans. Hims & Hers Health acquired Australian telehealth company Eucalyptus in June for up to $1.15 billion to expand internationally. Universal Health Services agreed to acquire virtual mental healthcare company Talkspace in March for about $835 million, and Sword Health acquired musculoskeletal digital health company Kaia Health in January for $285 million.

Overall dealmaking has actually slowed. Global digital health deal volume fell to 228 in the second quarter, a decade low and down 36% quarter over quarter, according to CB Insights — two-thirds below the 688-deal peak in the second quarter of 2022. But median deal size climbed 54% year to date to $7.7 million. The pattern: fewer deals, but bigger, more strategic ones aimed at building scaled, AI-native platforms rather than funding early-stage bets.

For hospital and health system leaders, the consolidation matters most where it touches primary care access and employer relationships. Included Health and Doctronic are both positioning themselves as a digital front door for families and employees — a role health systems and payers have long competed to own.

Ms. DaSilva’s move to lead Doctronic’s enterprise expansion, and Included Health’s push into alternative health plan design, both point to virtual care companies going more directly after the employer and payer contracts that once ran through health systems’ own primary care and referral networks. As these platforms scale, health system leaders will want to watch how much of that access and steerage shifts away from their own front doors.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/healthcare-information-technology/ai/the-ai-virtual-care-consolidation-wave/

'Suspected Iran-linked cyberattacks on US water systems spread to seven states - NYT'

 

Cyberattacks targeting US water systems have spread to at least seven states, with some incidents disrupting operations, the New York Times reported Saturday, citing federal officials and experts.

Officials said there was no evidence that drinking water had been contaminated or made unsafe, but some facilities were forced to issue boil-water notices or continue operating manually.

Michigan confirmed that a small number of communities had reported activity matching the federal warning, though the affected systems continued to operate safely, according to the report.

Federal officials consider Iran the leading suspect but said the investigation remained preliminary and had not established definitive forensic proof.

President Donald Trump rejected Iran’s involvement Friday, saying, “I don’t think there was an Iranian cyberattack.”

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202608014654

Lebanon may push for Bint Jbeil pilot zone

 Lebanon will seek to expand the pilot zones to include the heavily bombarded border town of Bint Jbeil during the next round of negotiations with Israel, scheduled to take place in Rome on August 4, Saudi broadcaster Al Hadath reported on Saturday, citing a Lebanese official.

Beirut is also expected to reject unilateral Israeli verification of the first phase and demand that an independent party oversee all monitoring. Bint Jbeil is the second-largest municipality in the Nabatiye Governorate in Lebanon's south, and served as a major Hezbollah stronghold.

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/Lebanon-may-push-for-Bint-Jbeil-pilot-zone/66830539


Closed Borders Killing Western Union, Earnings Call Transcripts Reveal

 Western Union CFO Matt Cagwin quietly acknowledged in yesterday’s earnings call that fewer border crossings under the Trump admin are chipping away at the remittance behemoth’s profits:

“New migration is the lifeline of our retail business. With borders closed, it is difficult to offset natural attrition as consumers return home to their native countries,” Cagwin said.

WU has long been the dominant vampire skimming absurd fees off international remittances while providing no technological convenience that Venmo hasn’t already surpassed. It’s instead maintained its now-dwindling market share through lobbying, which is why it can charge a 40% for a South Africa-to-Botswana cash transfer:

Western Union charges as high as 40,11% for a ~$84 USD remittance from South Africa to Botswana. Data from the World Bank, Q2 2021.

The firm’s decline is continuing a trend since President Trump took office for his second term, during which he’s been markedly more hawkish on immigration, with the United States seeing net negative migration last year for the first time in over half a century.

For 2025, it was reported that remittances from the U.S. to Mexico declined almost 5% for the year. Last year’s trend appears to be accelerating.

On yesterday’s earnings call, Western Union CEO Devin McGranahan said that remittances from “U.S. to Mexico declined a little over 3% on a transaction basis in the quarter [Q2, 2026].” 

WU’s stock was down 15% on the day, following the news. CEO McGranahan also acknowledged that immigration policy was the core driver behind the revenue loss: 

“As you know, remittances in the Americas have faced meaningful pressure that began in late 2024, driven by the changes in immigration policy… It just means it will be difficult to get the business back to true growth without a meaningful change in immigration policy…”

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/closed-borders-killing-western-union-earnings-call-transcripts-reveal

'New Guidelines Expand Statin Eligibility to More Than Half of US Adults'

 Newly released US dyslipidemia guidelines would expand recommendations for primary prevention statin therapy to 87.5 million US adults, new research suggested.

Released in March, the 2026 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology multisociety guideline on dyslipidemia broadened recommendations for statin therapy by extending atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk assessment from adults aged 40-75 years to those aged 30-79 years, expanding risk estimation beyond the next 10 years to several decades, and incorporating an updated risk calculator.

In a new analysis that used weighted data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), researchers estimated that the updated recommendations would make an additional 21.5 million US adults eligible for statins, increasing total eligibility to 87.5 million adults, or 56.6% of those aged 30-79 years.

Study investigator Timothy Anderson, MD, assistant professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh, said the shift toward a longer-term view of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk represents “a sea change” in discussions with patients.

“It’s moving from a focus on talking about 10-year risk to talking about 30-year and lifetime risk. It’s fundamentally a different conversation than most clinicians have with patients primarily because of prior recommendations,” he told Medscape Medical News.

The findings were published online on July 20 in JAMA, along with several accompanying papers, including an editorial.

A Starting Point?

Anderson, who also serves on the guideline writing committee, said the updated dyslipidemia guidelines were needed to reflect new evidence on emerging treatments and advances in how CVD risk is assessed.

He added that patients in their thirties and forties with high cholesterol, but without CVD or other conditions that place them at high cardiovascular risk, have often been advised to focus on diet and lifestyle changes rather than medication.

In addition to expanding ASCVD risk assessment to adults aged 30-79 years, the new clinical practice guideline recommends using the PREVENT-ASCVD equations and lowers the thresholds for ASCVD risk categories, defining low 10-year risk as less than 3% and high risk as 10% or greater.

To assess how the 2026 guideline would change statin eligibility among US adults without ASCVD compared with the 2018 guideline, researchers analyzed data from 4366 nonpregnant participants in the NHANES 2017-2023. The weighted sample represented nearly 154.5 million US adults (mean age, 51 years; 52% women).

Results showed that, in addition to the estimated 66 million US adults aged 30-79 years who were eligible for statins under the 2018 guideline, an additional 21.5 million would become eligible under the 2026 recommendations, increasing the total to an estimated 87.5 million adults.

Statin eligibility increased with age, ranging from 11.1% of adults aged 30-39 years to 93.5% of those aged 70-79 years. The largest increase in newly eligible individuals occurred among adults in their fifties (26.5%), followed by those in their forties (17.0%). Compared with those eligible under the 2018 guideline, newly eligible individuals generally had a lower estimated ASCVD risk.

Anderson noted in a news release that younger patients may question the need to start statin therapy when their short-term risk for a cardiovascular event appears low. “But for patients seeking to minimize risks of heart attacks and strokes, early statin therapy may be a good choice,” he said.

“The new guideline is first and foremost a starting point for a more individualized or personalized risk-benefit discussion between a patient and their physician. It’s not necessarily an ironclad requirement that all patients need to be on therapy,” Anderson added.

'Missed Opportunity of Millions’

A second analysis, led by Allison Peng, MD, of the Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, also evaluated the potential impact of the new guideline using NHANES data from 1999 to 2020. The study included 24,403 participants, representing nearly 98.5 million US adults aged 40-79 years.

Results showed an estimated 22% of US adults would be reclassified under the new guideline, primarily because more individuals would be categorized as having borderline 10-year risk for ASCVD.

Finally, a third study published the same day in JAMA and led by Shady Abohashem, MD, of the Cardiology Department at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, assessed the prevalence of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels above the new guideline targets. The analysis included 2313 NHANES participants aged 30-79 years from 2021 to 2023, representing 177.7 million US adults.

These results showed that an estimated 32.2% of US adults had LDL-C levels above the new guideline targets. The prevalence ranged from 9.9% among those at low ASCVD risk to 63.6% among those at borderline or intermediate risk and 82.0% among those at high risk. Among adults with LDL-C levels above the recommended target, 76.1% in the primary prevention group were not receiving lipid-lowering therapy (LLT).

“The gap between where the country’s cholesterol levels actually are and where the new guidelines say they should be is much wider than most people realize,” Abohashem noted in a release.

He added that although many heart attacks and strokes are preventable with medication, these treatments often fail to reach those who could benefit most, “and that is a missed opportunity at the scale of millions,” he said.

Public Health Burden

In an accompanying editorial, Philip Greenland, MD, and Karen E. Lasser, MD, senior and deputy editors of JAMA, respectively, noted that the differing estimates of newly statin-eligible adults reported by Anderson and Peng may reflect, in part, Anderson’s inclusion of a broader age range and the use of different NHANES survey years.

Anderson said the discrepancy may also reflect differences in study design. He noted that Peng’s analysis did not include lower-risk adults who became eligible for statins under the new guideline because of elevated 30-year ASCVD risk or high LDL-C levels. “And I think that’s where the biggest expansion in new recommendations comes from,” he added.

In their editorial, Greenland and Lasser wrote that the three studies together “confirm the long-standing observations” that a large proportion of US adults are candidates for LLT.

“This is a huge public health burden for the US population for a medical condition that should be highly treatable,” they wrote.

They also encouraged physicians to educate patients about the new guideline and statin therapy. “Patients should be primed to come to their medical visits asking, ‘Should I be taking a statin?’,” Greenland and Lasser wrote.

“We should also continue to advocate for universal health insurance coverage so that all US patients can receive medical care that includes screening and treatment for hyperlipidemia,” they concluded.

Anderson’s study was funded by the National Institute on Aging. Disclosure information for all study authors and the editorialists is available in the original publications.

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/new-guidelines-expand-statin-eligibility-more-than-half-us-2026a1000p5p

BrightSpring beats, raises guidance, sees 2026 Inflation Reduction Act revenue headwinds

 

BrightSpring beats Q2 2026 estimates, raises 2026 guidance, sees 2026 Inflation Reduction Act revenue headwinds of about $200 million and $175 million by segment

  • Q2 2026 EPS was $0.45 and revenue was $3.9B, both ahead of analyst estimates.
  • Company projected about a $200 million 2026 revenue impact in home and community pharmacy from the Inflation Reduction Act.
  • BrightSpring also forecast about a $175 million 2026 revenue hit in specialty and infusion from the Inflation Reduction Act.